By now, a lot of you will have heard about the controversy surrounding the Hot 97 crew on NY morning radio, who have been suspended indefinitely after playing an atrociously offensive “We Are The World” parody related to the tsunami tragedy.
Here’s a link to an article I picked up from Google News regarding the situation.
http://www.thuglifearmy.com/news/articles/50775/
Read through the thing and tell me if the conclusion is as fucked as I think it is.
Dark Matter 
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:07 pm
Re: on censorship
bingo, baby.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
on censorship
just my thoughts on it…
censorship, no.
but accountability, yes.
if someone’s got the balls to say whatever they want, however they want, then they should have the balls to own up to whatever may come.
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 28th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
Gotcha. 🙂
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
Nothing. Nothing at all.
My point is this: that the article did not suggest that there was anything wrong with the piece itself; merely that if you wanted to avoid the overly sensitive people from jumping all over it, you should simply do it on satellite radio.
I find that disturbing. It ends up essentially blaming those people who were offended by the piece for their sensitivity, and does not offer a critique of the piece itself.
The point was, the piece was crude and offensive, and shouldn’t have been aired.
To the matter of censorship: Censorship to me is something the government does to limit speech. This isn’t that.
This is about the self-awareness and empathy it takes to avoid causing pain to people by insensitive and offensive words or behavior.
Do they have a “right” to air it. Hells yeah. Do they have to suffere the consequences of airing it?
Bet your ass.
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 8:18 pm
What does that have to do with satellite radio?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
I believe they’ve been punished, don’t you? They lost their jobs.
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 7:01 pm
Punished? How? Why?
I mean, I know a lot of people who are what I would call idiots and I’m not looking to punish them.
How would you punish these “idiots”?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:57 pm
Censored? No.
Punished for being idiots? Yes.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:50 pm
Oh, so you think people should be censored?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:49 pm
Not everyone can make it!
The 5 Percent Nation is interesting for many reasons.
It’s a crazy offshoot of a crazy cult.
They use code to communicate through hip hop. Big into numerology.
I love that it’s a new religion that was founded in 1960s Harlem.
It isn’t really based on deity worship, but instead claims that the black man is god.
Now it’s inherently sexist, the black woman is merely a “queen” and serves her god, so I’ve decided to found an offshoot of it. One day we shall rise!
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
That the parody itself was a problem — not that it was jsut placed badly on the airwaves.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:44 pm
I dunno, I have no problem with satellite radio… it’s not regulated by the FCC so it’s ideal as far as I’m concerned.
Maybe I don’t understand what you mean.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:42 pm
I noticed you left Busta off your list.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Well, I’m down with the Goddesses and The Slayers.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:39 pm
*sigh*
No consciousness, so far as I can tell, of the inherent “wrongness” of the act.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:27 pm
Sad as it is, that’s exactly how satellite radio is trying to position itself, and Howard Stern was just the beginning. Hell, Stern’s either going to have to ramp it up or he’s going to be seen as relatively tame with what’s heading in that direction.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:14 pm
Hey, that reminds me — what’s your fascination with the Five Per Centers?
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:13 pm
Yeah, the last paragraph. The one that said the answer is to do this stuff on satellite radio instead.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.
January 27th, 2005 at 6:11 pm
Do you mean the last paragraph?
I wonder what hilarious song these assholes aired after September 11th… oh right, white Americans died in that. So, none.