A poet with a history in slam, lots of publications; my personal poetry and a little bit of daily life and opinions. Read the page called "About..." for the details.
View all posts by Tony Brown
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 1st, 2004 at 9:05 pm and posted in uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
Dark Matter 
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 8:57 am
the truth will remain hidden…as usual with rape cases.
what relevance the presence of another man’s semen had will never be known, because kobe’s defenders have shown that if you harass the victim enough, you can make any charge go away. but hey, the mafia has known that for decades.
on the other hand, there’s been some suggestion that this was all a result of poorly funded court system. maybe. but I can’t see how one “accidentally” posts the name and address of rape victims on a web site. I can see how that could be anything but malicious harassment.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 2nd, 2004 at 6:57 am
Re: off the hook
Wish I’d said that.
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 11:03 pm
off the hook
kobe walks…i believe it is more like “traveling.”
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 10:04 pm
Oh, I’m in agreement on that, Keith. This whole case was ugly from the beginning.
I’m merely suggesting that the “truth”, in this case as in who knew what when, what actually transpired between them, etc, isn’t likely to ever come out after the settlement.
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 9:42 pm
Re: Next up?
If I am not mistaken, the presumption of innocence would still be in effect here. And yes, that other semen they found was precisely what Kobe’s defense was waiting to jump on. The other DNA was only new in the USA. All of Colorado was preparing for a necktie party. Imagine the dissapointment.
kr
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:24 pm
Re: Next up?
Checking out a British news source would indicate that the prosecution couldn’t get past the fact that other DNA was discovered on the victim.
My prediction? Settlement, fast, and silent, on the civil suit. And it all goes away, and the truth remains hidden.
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…
September 1st, 2004 at 7:21 pm
Next up?
well, a Kennedy hasn’t been accused of rape in a while.
Oh wait…