Since I’ve run out of stories to tell,
I go at last to the cupboard
and pull out the bag of walnuts
and a hammer.
Laid out before me on the floor,
lined up on butcher paper,
points facing away so there will be no
projectile damage from the blows,
they await my creativity. I raise the tool
and bring it down on the one to the far left,
choosing the order in which I would read
a book if a book required violence of me.
Inside is the whole meat, which predictably
looks to me like a brain. I see the walnut
as a brain, meaning that my brain
sees itself in the walnut, as we are creatures
of comparison. Yet I did not think at once
of the whole nuts as skulls, curiously. Despite
the all-encompassing violence of the process,
there’s a break in the perception. Perhaps
I can find a source in literature which will illuminate
the source of the dissonance. I go at once to the bookcase
to seek examples in literature of walnuts being compared
to skulls, and find (of course) many with a brain metaphor
and none with a skull metaphor. I go back to the nuts
and stare at the next one, trying to see a face, a reflection
of humanity, something to hang a meaning on…nothing.
Nothing at all comes to mind. Now, I’ve got a dilemma:
should I continue cracking these walnuts
if I have no social, existential, philosophical,
grounds to work from when I observe them?
I’m just a man, after all; how will I know anything
about the walnuts if I can’t see myself in them?

Leave a comment